QUICK SUMMARY
Gilbert residents express concerns over potential intimidation after council members questioned the legitimacy of public records requests. Council members Chuck Bongiovanni and Jim Torgeson suggested limiting these requests, leading residents to fear retaliation. They argue for their right to access records anonymously as guaranteed by Arizona’s Public Records Law.
Concerns about potential intimidation have arisen among Gilbert residents following comments from council members regarding public records requests. During a March 25 meeting, council members Chuck Bongiovanni and Jim Torgeson questioned the costs associated with these requests and suggested limiting what they called “frequent wasteful requests.” Local residents, including Mindy Brocker, expressed fears of retaliation for seeking transparency, asserting their right to access records without the threat of harassment. Brocker, who has made requests in the past, argued that anonymity is essential for citizens to exercise their rights under Arizona's Public Records Law. This law requires municipalities to process requests promptly and does not consider the motives of requesters. Critics argue that the council's comments could deter residents from seeking information vital for holding local officials accountable. Torgeson defended his stance, claiming the goal was to save the town money and ensure greater transparency. The situation underscores a critical clash between local governance practices and the rights of residents to access public information.